Talk:Logical Machine Corporation
Appearance
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | A fact from Logical Machine Corporation appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 14 March 2023 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
| ![]() |
Did you know nomination
[edit]- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Cielquiparle (talk) 23:30, 8 March 2023 (UTC)
( )
- ... that outcry from NOW led Logical Machine Corporation to recall an advertisement featuring a naked woman seated in front of their ADAM minicomputer? Source: "Computer Firm Bows to Now; 'Eve' Is Gone".
- ALT1: ... that Logical Machine Corporation product range of computers included the ADAM, the Mike, and the Tina? Source: passim
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Hodges Figgis
Created by DigitalIceAge (talk). Self-nominated at 06:20, 15 February 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Logical Machine Corporation; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
---|
|
Hook eligibility:
- Cited:
- n
- Interesting:
QPQ: - Not done
Overall: @DigitalIceAge: Good article. Though, what's the citation for alt1 supposed to be. Also waiting on a QPQ. Onegreatjoke (talk) 19:18, 15 February 2023 (UTC)
- @Onegreatjoke: Supposed to be "'Doctor's' out of work—again" (ref 16) and "Logical step: Conversational computers" (ref 15)—I was too lazy to cite 'em, my bad. QPQ now supplied. Thanks again for the review! DigitalIceAge (talk) 01:28, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
Approve. Onegreatjoke (talk) 20:06, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
Categories:
- C-Class company articles
- Low-importance company articles
- WikiProject Companies articles
- C-Class Computing articles
- Low-importance Computing articles
- C-Class Computer hardware articles
- Mid-importance Computer hardware articles
- C-Class Computer hardware articles of Mid-importance
- All Computing articles
- C-Class software articles
- Low-importance software articles
- C-Class software articles of Low-importance
- Unknown-importance Computing articles
- All Software articles
- C-Class United States articles
- Low-importance United States articles
- C-Class United States articles of Low-importance
- WikiProject United States articles
- C-Class California articles
- Low-importance California articles
- WikiProject California articles
- Wikipedia Did you know articles